- Sept 21: 2.1T-param base (up from 1.5T), 500K context, priced identically to 4.6 at $2/$6 per M tokens.
- Trained on a longer RL run weighted toward multi-hour tasks; xAI calls it their 'agent stamina' model.
- Benchmarks: 71.0% DeepSWE v1.1 (up from 65.2%), 46.3% CursorBench 4.0, 38.0% Terminal-Bench — still trails Fable 5.1 on the coding suites.
- HackerBench v0.3 safety score: allows 3.3% of risky dual-use prompts, xAI's tightest guardrails yet.
- HN thread: 490 points, 410 comments — debate is 'meaningful bump' vs 'still behind the frontier.'
- Sept 21: Amazon started returning a Conditions-of-Use popup to any Muse-driven checkout after Meta refused a removal request.
- Amazon says Muse hides its agent identity and retains customer credentials without disclosure.
- Meta counters that Muse runs in a per-user VM and uses Stripe Link single-use cards — passwords stay in secure storage.
- First public block of a frontier-lab shopping agent by a major retailer; sets the template for TOS-vs-agent fights.
- HN + Bloomberg + TechCrunch all picked it up within hours; 140 pts, 148 comments on HN.
- Open-source protocol where agents declare intent — symbol, api, schema, config, migration, contract — before touching code.
- Catches semantic clashes Git misses, like two agents renaming the same symbol in different files.
- 0.4.0 ships a CLI, JSON API, MCP server, SQLite store, and deterministic conflict detector.
- Landed the same week Linear's engineering blog argued CI is now the bottleneck for AI-coding-heavy teams.
- Engineering write-up on how Cursor/Claude/Copilot volume broke Linear's CI economics: queue times up, feedback loops slower than the agents writing the code.
- Their fix: per-PR test selection, cached graph builds, and a merge queue that admits by predicted risk, not FIFO.
- 129 pts, 125 comments on HN — the 'we all have this problem' thread of the day.
- Reinforces the emerging thesis behind Foremerge and lossless-memory: the surrounding tooling, not the models, is the next bottleneck.
- John Hartnup's June post explodes on HN this weekend after making the point that ChatGPT will produce Bauhaus, Risograph, or cut-paper posters if you ask precisely.
- The counter-argument in the comments: the skill floor is now taste and prompt discipline, not the model.
- 1,856 points and 942 comments — the #1 story across all of HN today, not just AI.
- Serves as the counterexample the 'AI slop' discourse has been missing for six months.
- Personal AI memory layer that stores every conversation verbatim behind a vector index — no rolling summaries, no compression.
- Pitched at audit trails, reproducibility, and debugging agent runs; storage cost is the main open question in the thread.
- 57 pts, 21 comments on HN in its first day; part of a small wave of 'context-window amnesia' tools this month.
01
xAI Ships Grok 4.7 With 2.1T Params and Multi-Hour Agent Training
models x.ai
02
Amazon Blocks Meta's Muse Shopping Agent, Escalating the Agentic Web Fight
industry techcrunch.com
03
Foremerge Adds a Coordination Layer Above Git for Parallel Coding Agents
tools github.com
04
Linear: AI Coding Has Turned CI Into the Bottleneck
tools linear.app
05
AI-Generated Posters Don't Have to Be Horrible, and HN Can't Stop Talking About It
community john.hartnup.uk
06
Show HN: Lossless-Memory Skips Summaries, Keeps Every Turn Verbatim
open-source github.com